Kerry Bretz is a former INS trial attorney and partner at Bretz & Coven. His private practice is defined by his dedication to progressive, fair immigration laws that reflect the true value immigrants bring to the United States and the original promises of the United States as a place where people can pursue life, liberty, and happiness.
Kerry Bretz has played a major role in challenging the retroactive application of new immigration laws and mandatory detention. He was instrumental in winning major deportation cases, such as Henderson v INS and Calcano-Martinez v INS, which cases have changed the national scene on the availability of relief to aliens with criminal convictions.
Additionally, in St John v McElroy, Kerry Bretz helped acheive the release of a mentally disabled women from INS custody and was awarded approximately $88,000 in attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act by a federal court judge. Further, he obtained an additional monetary settlement to Ms. St John under the Federal Tort Claims Act for alleged abuses she suffered while detained by the INS.
Prior to private practice, Kerry Bretz was a Trial Attorney for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service. As a result, he brings a unique perspective to every client’s case and can effectively strategize each individual case. He is regularly consulted by the criminal defense bar, is frequently quoted in newspapers, has appeared on reputable television programs and radio shows.
Kerry Bretz is an active member of the American Immigration Lawyer’s Association and is often asked to speak at its annual conference. He is also Commissioner for the Archdiocese’s Commission for the Dignity of Immigrants.
Kerry Bretz has been selected to be listed in The Best Lawyers in America© for his work in the practice area of Immigration Law. Inclusion in Best Lawyers is based on an exhaustive and rigorous peer-review survey comprising more than 5.5 million confidential evaluations by top attorneys. Best Lawyersis regarded – by both the profession and the public – as the most credible and definitive guide to legal excellence in the United States
Kerry Bretz is Martindale-Hubbell® AV-Rated®, the highest peer-review rating an attorney can receive.
Features
License
Licensed in New York
State: New York
Acquired: 1992
Currently Registered
Licensed in Connecticut
State: Connecticut
Acquired: 1991
Active
-
Honors
2016 - Best Law Firms in New York First -Tier Rating, U.S. News & World Report
2015 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2012 - Super Lawyers, Super Lawyers
2012 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2011 - Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers
2011 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2010 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2010 - Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2009 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2008 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2007 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2006 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2005 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2004 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2003 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2002 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2001 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2000 - AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
-
Work Experience
1999 - Present Partner, Bretz &Coven, LLP
1994 - 1999 Owner, Bretz & Associates
1991 - 1994 Trial Attorney, Legacy INS of the Department of Justice
-
Sample of Legal Cases
St. John v. McElroy, 917 F. Supp. 243 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) -
MS. ST. JOHN WAS FOUND STATUTORILY ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE BECAUSE INA § 236(E) WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED TO RETURNING PERMANENT RESIDENTS WHO RETAINED DUE PROCESS RIGHTS DESPITE THEIR ABSENCE FROM THE COUNTRY. I WAS AWARDED $88,000 FIN EAJA FEES.
Henderson v. INS, 157 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 1998) -
THE PROVISION OF THE AEDPA THAT LIMITS THE AVAILABILITY OF INA § 212(C) WAIVERS DOES NOT APPLY RETROACTIVELY TO NONCITIZENS WHOSE DEPORTATION OR EXCLUSION PROCEEDINGS WERE PENDING ON THE DATE OF ITS ENACTMENT.
Calcano-Martinez v. INS, 533 U.S. 348 (2001) -
THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT IIRIRA EXPRESSLY PRECLUDED THE COURT OF APPEALS FROM EXERCISING JURISDICTION TO REVIEW A FINAL REMOVAL ORDER, BUT THAT PETITIONERS MAY PURSUE THEIR CLAIMS IN A HABEAS CORPUS ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
-
Associations
1994 - Present
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1992 - Present
New York County Lawyers' Association
-
Education
1991 - City University of New York School of Law at Queens College - JD - Juris Doctor
1988 - City University of New York, Lehman College - Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude
-
Publications
1999 - AILA's Handbook on Waivers and Relief from Removal
Basic on Habeas Corpus
1999 - Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act & Supporting Memorandum of Law
AILA's Litigation Toolbox
Languages
Armenian - Native / Fluent
English - Native / Fluent
Korean - Native / Fluent
Bengali - Native / Fluent
French - Native / Fluent
Portuguese - Native / Fluent
Mandarin - Native / Fluent
Hindi - Native / Fluent
Russian - Native / Fluent
Cantonese - Native / Fluent
Italian - Native / Fluent
Spanish - Native / Fluent
Add Review
Leave a Reply